2 basic concepts of fine piano tone

Bosendorfer rim kerfs

Let’s digress for a moment and speak in gross generalizations about concepts of piano tone.

I have come to the conclusion, specifically reinforced by Udo Steingraeber, that there are fundamentally 2 approaches to piano tone; high rim tension and low rim tension. (don’t bust my chops on theoretical details, remember this is gross generalization).

Low rim tension is characterized, IN MY OPINION, by Bosendorfer, Förster, and Blüthner, to name 3. These makers want no tension in the outer rim and to varying degrees want the rim to actually play an active role in tone production. These may be solid spruce like Bosendorfer, or layered like Bluthner, but they are not bent under great pressure when mating them with the piano. Again I’m open to correction, but Christian Blüthner himself described the layered/sectioned rim of a Blüthner as having “no tension”.

Continue reading

Posted in The piano world | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Rare piano logo in New York Times

You rarely see the logo of a European piano manufacturer in photos that occasionally accompany music reviews in the New York Times. But it does occasionally happen as shown here with the relevant text.
Fazioli in the New York Times

The three musicians gave committed performances throughout the evening. Mr. Lepauw played with sparkling clarity on the bright-toned Fazioli piano … “

Posted in The piano world | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I am diminished….

The music world lost a great man on Sunday. Dr. Mark P. Malkovich III, artistic director of the Newport Music Festival, died in a car accident in Minnesota. I also lost a dear friend and mentor. The words of the title of this post were uttered by Leonard Bernstein when he learned of the death of Glenn Gould. They could not be more appropriate.

I will leave it to others, at least for now, to extol on his virtues and how far he brought the Newport Festival. I am going to comment on what it means to know somebody who truly is a “being of music”.

I first met Mark in 1980 when I went to Newport to maintain the Bosendorfers that were used as concert pianos. Later I went back every year in my role as Artist Services Director for Yamaha as Yamaha had become the official piano of the Festival.

Mark and I collaborated on 3 recitals at Alice Tully Hall in NYC. We presented Sergio Fiorentino (twice) and Dubravka Tomsic. Now maybe you don’t know those names (lots of professionals did not know Fiorentino) and that’s OK. But if you do, you know the almost unbelievable level of artistry that these two humble, relatively unsung pianists represented. Hearing these 2 artists at Newport and again at Tully were among the highlights of my music loving life.

Mark brought me into the world of these artists, and many more like them, as well as into a world of repertoire that is almost beyond imagination. And through it all he was brilliant, funny, supportive, loving and unique. Music was his life, his soul and his being and it showed. His loss will show too.

I’ve said before that I think the Newport Festival is the greatest music festival in the world. It was Mark’s artistic vision, management and humanness that made it so. Go here to learn more about the festival and click on the Newport Festival category on the right to read my earlier posts.

Rest in peace Mark. Your friends will miss you.

Posted in The piano world | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bosendorfer opens new selection center

The new selection center in Wiener Neustadt Austria opened with a performance by Paul Badura-Skoda

Bosendorfer selection center

Bosendorfer selection center

Bosendorfer selection center

Posted in The piano world | Tagged | Leave a comment

What does quality mean?

Quality is a term that is passed about with great ease in the piano industry. The term itself has a rather benign meaning; “high grade, superiority, excellence”. But what does that mean in the piano world and is there any reason the term high quality should be limited to certain makers?

If you’ve been exposed to marketing in the piano industry you realize that just about any construction trait can be justified and explained, even if it seems in direct opposition to other makers. For example, the proponents of the new Phoenix bridge system say that it eliminates the need for down bearing in a piano. However in traditional design down bearing is, next to tuning pin torque, a fundamental requirement. More important, frankly, than 88 keys!

Quality is not necessarily the most important trait of a piano. Calling a piano high quality may mean next to nothing especially if the characteristic of a particular maker falls short in a more critical area: consistency.

To be consistent means that you can build something the same way more than once, and in the piano world this is important since most pianos are lifetime purchases. In fact with most pianos, their true tonal nature is not necessarily obvious when they are brand new. Consistency means that the high quality a particular company’s marketing material refers to is more than just random chance. If you can do something consistently, it means you really understand what you are doing and mean for it to turn out that way. Consistency implies quality, because it is intentional.

There is a prominent piano maker who is known for “quality”, but they are also known for being maddeningly inconsistent. In fact they have turned this, remarkably, into an attribute, stressing that no two of their pianos are alike and one should try a number of their pianos to find one that one likes. It is true that when one is of these brand of pianos is properly made they can be, to those that like their individual sound, wonderful instruments. However the degree of variability goes from sublime to unplayable. In fact, it is a certain badge of honor among accomplished piano technicians that they can make these actions “work”, regardless of the regulation specification. These technicians take great pride in the fact that they use regulation specifications as “guidelines” since regulating an action perfectly to specs does not guarantee that that action will play; that is how great the manufacturing variability is.

Now it is true that pianos by their very nature vary to some degree. They are very complex items made out of materials that are not known for great consistency, such as wood and felt. And yet, there are makers at most price points that turn out remarkably consistent products. There may be one brand that appeals to an individual more than another, but they all play fine, tune and regulate fine, and sound comfortably within the norms of that particular maker.

Consistency does not necessarily mean that you will like the end result. Many makers from Asia are known for remarkable consistency. However you may not be a fan of the sound, even while honoring their consistency of construction. However, I believe that this consistency is a higher measure of quality. This trumps the quality of the one example of a makers output that is beautiful, while 4 are unplayable and 5 are varying degrees of so-so.

After all, it’s your money and maybe you are not the best positioned to judge the ultimate quality of a piano. Shouldn’t you be able to count on something from a maker than just hollow marketing claims and the luck of the draw?

Posted in Ramblings, The piano world | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Old dogs

Some of you may have been following my very slow progress toward regaining my RPT status. For those who don’t know, the Piano Technicians Guild (PTG) provides structure to the industry of piano maintenance, producing annual national conventions and numerous regional ones that focus on education, training and professional behavior. In an effort to standardize a way of measuring skills, the guild offers RPT status, which stands for Registered Piano Technician. To achieve RPT status, one must pass a series of tests, including a written test, a bench test consisting of 3 parts (grands, uprights and repairs) and a multi part, 4 hour tuning test.

I originally achieved RPT status in 1980 but, in a stroke of idiocy, let my membership to the Guild lapse about 10 years ago. Being an Associate has bugged me and I’ve had it in my mind to regain the RPT level if for no other reason than the fact that not many people in my place in the piano business have it. Generally one is either a tech or a sales/marketing guy. Sure, some sales/marketing guys claim to be techs but not may of them actually have the RPT badge.

Anyway, after thinking about it for a long time and putting it off for over a year, I finally got it together and took the tuning exam last week (more on the tech exam later). I was pretty confident I would pass as I have tuned a lot in my life, but I haven’t been actively involved in piano tech work for some time, so you never know.

Well, I’ll cut to the chase; I nailed it. Click on the image to see the proof. I guess I got lazy in the treble section, but I’m pretty happy with the rest. I mean come on…98% in the high treble!?!? At MY age!?!?

Passing is 80% in all sections and those who achieve 90% or greater in all sections, while tuning completely aurally, are eligible for CTE (Certified Tuning Examiner)status which means, as I was told, that after training I could give my life away to the Guild and oversee tuning tests.

Yes, I’m pretty jazzed about the results because it means that even old dogs can still have it. Thank God I will never have to tune another piano!

PS. I’m still not an RPT… the technical exam still needs to be, uh, mastered.

Posted in Piano Technology | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Frankfurt Music Show 2010

Frankfurt MesseThere are 2 major Musical Instrument trade shows each year. The NAMM show, held in Los Angeles in January and the Frankfurt Messe, in March in Frankfurt Germany. The shows have much of the same content and atmosphere. They are both huge shows with everything from violins to conducting batons to disco fog machines and everything in between. While most of the big vendors are the same (Yamaha, Kawai, Roland, Fender, etc) there are some striking regional differences.

For example, who knew that accordions were such important instruments in Europe? There were probably 30 accordion makers and stunning displays of accordion virtuosity. We suffer under the Lawrence Welk impression of accordions in this country. In the hands of a skilled European artist, it is an instrument of uncommon richness and expression.

Other displays centered on the strong tradition of civic brass bands in Germany, and included interesting instruments and a variety of uniform makers.These unusual brass instruments included a wide selection of opera specific trumpets (one set just for Aida, another for specific Wagner operas).  I didn’t notice  many performances by brass or woodwind artists but there were a number of what appeared to be spontaneous performances by acoustic guitar solo artists and small ensembles and a stunning duet playing what appeared to be the professional version of blades of grass held between the palms and blown through (you had to be there).

There were, of course ( I guess), Alpen Horns on display, harmonicas of every possible size as well as the normal room after room of guitars, amplifiers, speaker systems, drums and the like.

I was not there for the accordions, however. I was there for the pianos and specifically the high end ones which this year had their own display room.

Trade shows have been problematic for piano makers over the past years. The cost of renting display space is significant onto which one adds the cost of transporting the instruments as well as the tuning and prep that goes into making them ready. Large parts of the music show floor, whether at NAMM or Frankfurt, have very loud volume levels from the guitars screaming and the drums pounding. The brass displays are particularly loud with every trumpeter bent on proving their ability to hit a fff high C, over and over! This is NOT the environment in which to listen to the fine details of piano sound.

A number of the European makers chose not to attend the Frankfurt show last year for these reasons. That caused the the show organizers to create a separate piano salon this year, quite apart from the noise and the bustle of the regular show floor. From my perspective the piano salon was quite pleasant and a number of the makers agreed.

Still business conditions kept some of the makers away and others have a tradition of not displaying. The makers that were there included  Blüthner, Forster, Steingraeber, Grotrian, Fazioli, Schimmel, Seiler and Petrof.

By most reports, business for the piano makers was quite good, considering overall business conditions. There was what appeared to be a good flow of visitors and meetings clearly had to be scheduled since a couple of the makers did not appear to have any spare time at all.

Blüthner had the biggest booth of the group and had a separate display for the recently acquired Ronisch brand. Schimmel displayed and announced that they had renegotiated with creditors and were back in family control. Seiler displayed with no hint of the ownership by Samick.

Click here to see a slide show

Posted in The piano world | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Steinway takes additional Samick Investment

Steinway Raises $27 Million

On March 30, Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. announced that, pursuant to the previously announced subscription agreement, Samick Musical Instruments Co., Ltd. has exercised its option to purchase an additional 1.7 million shares of ordinary common stock at an exercise price of $16 per share. Steinway intends to use the proceeds to retire outstanding debt and for general corporate purposes.

Posted in The piano world | Tagged | Leave a comment

NEXT!!!

Today is March 31, the last day of my current direct involvement with Bosendorfer. It’s been great, thanks to everybody involved, but I’m itching to move on.

Stay tuned.

Posted in At work, The piano world | 1 Comment

The Frederick Collection and the world’s great piano builders

Click here for a great Slate article, make sure you read to the end.

Posted in The piano world | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment